In
John Q, Denzel Washington imitates Jackson's imprint when he is forced to take hostages of his own, also in Chicago. I may have to see this film now that it has entered the pattern, but I was pretty sure it sucked. Again, the poster's designers made sure to emphasize the gun.
The same could be said for Bruce Willis'
Hostage (I'm always at odds with sitting through a movie that I feel might be terrible for the pattern relevance...). In this poster, the inclusion of the handgun almost seems like a photoshopped afterthought. I know the handgun is a phallic symbol, but is there a connection to the pattern of hostage negotiation?
Speaking of Bruce Willis...
In a movie that most definitely did not suck The Siege, Denzel plays an FBI agent who opens the film as a hostage Negotiator when terrorists threaten to blow up a bus. The hijackers test the FBI response times by faking a hostage situation using blue paint bombs instead of live explosives. Willis' inclusion in the pattern spotlights the alternative to negotiation in hostage situations (there will be no negotiation, i.e. kill 'em all) via roles in Die Hard, The Fifth Element and The Siege. "The United States Government does not negotiate with terrorists." How many action movies have drilled that phrase into our heads?
In The Siege, Denzel plays the lone Voice of Reason in the film's pivotal torture scene. Denzel's point about the U.S. military becoming no better than terrorists [by torturing them] resonates with the theme of role-reversal (good guy becomes bad guy and vice versa) in The Negotiator, John Q, Metro and Pulp Fiction. Denzel finds himself on the wrong side of the law -again- when he decides to act on his convictions in order to stop Bruce Willis from terrorizing Muslim extremists.
Up is down, right is wrong, legal is immoral, criminal is righteous...
I could probably write an entire post just on
The Siege, but for the purposes of this pattern, it led me straight to Spike Lee's
Inside Man (great film), in which Denzel again must negotiate with a "terrorist" alongside the underrated
Chiwetel Ejiofor (look this guy up), who gets to be in
2012 with synch-star John Cusack. Washington does more good-bad switching in this film as he (Spoiler Alert!) actually becomes a
jewel thief himself by the film's end.
blue n gold tie #1...
blue n gold tie #2... am i lookin too hard? Denzel's imprint as the negotiator came full circle with this year's Pelham 123, which had me wondering about Travolta and why he needed to be squeezed into yet another bad guy role that is anything but fitting. What is the significance of the hijacker/terrorist role Travolta's been playing lately and why must he oppose the Voice of Reason?
I got the gun, I make the rules I'd bet money that
Pelham 123 will feature strong themes of good guy/bad guy reversals and that Denzel's Voice of Reason will put him in a place of self-sacrifice as the Negotiator. "Let the hostages go; take me instead..."
toure synch-edit:
In 2001, the Wachowski Brothers followed up the most groundbreaking synchtastic super film of the decade with a lackluster action flick called Swordfish. The film opened at #1 on June 10th as the 23rd number-1 of the year (23rd #1, 123, duh, right?). The film holds a special place in my heart as the movie that confirmed [for me] that the Wachowski Brothers did not write The Matrix as claimed.
it's not a sync, it's just a damn coffee cup In the film's action-packed opening,
Don Cheadle, as the black hostage Negotiator, tries unsuccessfully to talk down John Travolta. Travolta's character in the movie is named Gabriel Shear, most likely named for the angel
Gabriel, known as both the Angel of Death and the Messenger, or the Voice of God. This, for me, confirms the previous connection I made between Samuel L. and Samael. In
Pulp Fiction, Sam Jackson shouts "
I AM the Lord" (speaking as the voice of God) before pulling the trigger (as the angel of death)...
But back to Don Cheadle;
Don's recent film
Traitor -which I have to watch again- highlights the good guy/bad guy reversals in this pattern, especially Denzel Washington's role in
The Siege. Denzel becomes a literal traitor when he -a government agent- takes on Bruce Willis and the Marines. The pendulum swings back the other way for Cheadle in
Devil In a Blue Dress where he plays a bad guy who goes good alongside Mr. Washington.
Denzel Negotiates with the Angel of Death In
Devil In A Blue Dress, Cheadle plays a murder-happy gangster who decides to do a [well-paid] good deed and help his old friend Easy Rollins
(ER, Re?), played by Denzel. All this good-bad switching has my head spinning. I'm not sure what to make of the color associations, but I think there is a pattern of transition, flux... good to bad to good ad infintum. Samael Jackson's coffee cup may tag him as the golden boy (good being bad) but after washing the blood off and meeting the wolf, he turns blue (bad being good? wtf?). I have no idea what's going on...
Whatever the meaning, Jim's incredible
214=BAD connection from
Juno Temple seems to fit quite perfectly;
"He's a big bad wolf in your neighborhood.
Not bad meaning bad but bad meaning good."
-Run DMC
Jake:
Was going over the images in Toure's wicked post again when I noticed the Koffee Kup I am drinking from is 'N Sync with the Pulp Fiction shot of our Stars with Blue and Yellow Black Pool Mugs.
Spock on the left with Blue and KirK on the right in yellow. A Galactic swirl, Cosmic Heart of MOM sync winks hello betwixt the Star travelers...
I love this image from "Pulp Fiction", are they staring (resonates Starring (as in "Pulp Fiction" Starring Travolta and Jackson) while a Star Ring is the Zodiac or Galaxy) at Keitel (Wolf) or Tarantino (Tarantula crossed with Torino (Bull))? Will verify.